, , ,

A Diatribe against Data Contracts and their Abuses.

Ok, so I don’t really mean all that. Or do I? I have no idea what the future holds. Sometimes it’s easy to pick out the winners, like Databricks and Snowflake, you can see, feel, and taste the results of those data products, a delicious and delectable bounty to feast upon. Other things are harder to read the tea leaves on. Kinda like Data Mesh … is it a thing, or is it not a thing? It’s hard to decern between charlatans and marketing/sales departments hocking the next Cure All Snake Oil and real life.

What about all this recent humdrum and buzz around Data Contracts? Pushed by some popular Data Engineering faces like Ananth Packkildurai and Chad Sanderson. What is all the hype about Data Contracts, are folks just pushing another tool down our throats? Is there a real issue and problem that can be solved with Data Contracts?

Read more
, , , , ,

Soda-Core. Data Quality at Scale.

Photo by Tim Schmidbauer on Unsplash

Ever since playing with Great Expectations with Spark some time ago, I’ve been on the lookout for more Data Quality at-scale tools. The market still has a long way to go with these tools, not enough options, hard to use, and the typical Data Engineering travails. I came across soda-core recently, a self-proclaimed…

“Data reliability testing for SQL- and Spark- accesssible data.“

soda-core docs

Doing anything at scale, well … that’s usually the problem. Data Quality and Observability are topics were hear a lot about these days. The reality often doesn’t meet the expectations most of the time. Even Great Expectations, being awesome, can get complicated real quick-like. Let’s hope that soda-core pair with Spark can show us some real promise. Code available on GitHub.

Read more
, , , ,

You Only Need 2 Data Validations, That’s It.

Photo by Scott Webb on Unsplash

I mean, I’m sort of being facetious and sort of not. I mean there is some truth that rings out in those words. I’m sure someone selling Data Observability tools, or writing Great Expectations all-day will not like the idea of relying on only 2 data validations. But honestly, these two are probably more than 80% of Data Teams are using today for validation, which is none. What 2 are you? Glad you asked.

Read more
, , , , ,

Great Expectations with Databricks and Apache Spark. A Tale of Data Quality.

Photo by Joshua Sortino on Unsplash

It still seems like the wild west of Data Quality these days. Tools like Apache Deque are just too much for most folks, and Data Quality is still new enough to the scene as a serious thought topic that most tools haven’t matured that much, and companies dropping money on some tool is still a little suspect. I’ve probably heard more about Great Expectations as a DQ tool than most.

With the popularity of PySpark as a Big Data tool, and Great Expectations coming into its own, I’ve been meaning to dive into what it would actually look like to to use Great Expectations at scale and answer some simple questions. How easy is it to get up and running with Spark, what’s the path of least resistance to getting some basic Data Quality checks in place in a data pipeline.

Read more
, , , , ,

Data Quality – Great Expectations for Data Engineers

Mmmm … Data Quality … it is a thing these days. I look forlornly back to the ancient days of SQL Server when nobody cared about such things. Alas, we live in a different world, where hundreds of terabytes of data are the norm, and Data Quality becomes a thing. I’ve been meaning to give Great Expectations a poke for like a year, but just haven’t had the time or inclination to do so, but times are changing, and so should I.

I’m not really planning on giving an in-depth guide to Data Quality with Great Expectations, what I’m more interested in are topics like, how easy is it to set up and use, what’s the overhead, what are the main features and concepts and are they easy to understand. I find this sort of review of Data Engineering tools to be more helpful than simply a regurgitation of the documentation.

Read more